Oh my, I hadn’t seen anyone smoke a pipe in years. Didn’t
know they still made them. But there was C.W. puffing away on one, sitting at a
patio table. His shape was a lot like the late playwright Arthur Millar. He had
books and papers scattered in front of him.
He motioned for me to join him and I did.
He waved a hand across the pile of material before him like
he was giving it his blessing. “I think,” he said, “that I’ve about figured it
out.”
“How to look anachronistic?”
He ignored me. “Why your species is so unwilling to move into
the future,” he said.
“Elucidate.” I could tell he was in one of his serious
moments, and I enjoy those.
“Do you ever think about the monumental and complex problems
facing your planet?” he said.
“All the time.”
“Ever thing of what it will take to solve those problems?”
“Probably things that we haven’t thought of yet.”
“Precisely,” he said.
That made me feel good. He rarely acknowledges that I know
anything.
“Continue, please,” I said.
“Ever wonder,” he said, continuing in a questioning mode, “why
one of the world’s richest families, emanating by the way,” he said, “from your
own state, has joined hands with major religious institutions and a dominant
political party in a plan to abrogate your current system of educating your
children? Ever say, to yourself, what do they have to gain by denouncing
reason, science, and the ability to address problems in a cognitive way?”
“You are right. It doesn’t make sense.”
He smiled, nodded, and picked up a large book from the
table. “Ever read this?” he asked. It was a worn copy of The Golden Bough, by Sir James George Frazer, a Scottish social
anthropologist, influential in the early stages of the modern studies of
mythology and comparative religion. He is often considered one of the founding
fathers of modern anthropology.
I nodded and smiled myself. “Yes, but it was a long time ago
in a different lifetime.” A flood of memories washed over me. “I credit Frazer with
freeing me from the shackles of mythology forged on me as a child.” I was sort
of screwing with him by resorting to flowery language.
He ignored me. “Then you know how he recorded humankind’s
cognitive process, beginning first with magic as a method of controlling the
environment.”
“I seem to remember.”
“Then,” he continued, as it gradually dawned on your species
that dances and incantations weren’t really able to change things, and that people
didn’t suffer because you made a doll-like image of them suffer.”
“Go on.”
“So,” he said, “the thinkers of that time decided that external
forces must guide their world. They chose religion, assuming there are personal
agents, superior to man, controlling nature. It has been said that this
is a far more complex notion than that of magic, and requires a much higher
degree of intelligence.”
“This is getting a bit deep,” I said.
“We’re almost there,” he said. “Hang with me.”
What else could I do?
“We are now at the point in the evolution of your people at
which they thought that reliance on a divine source might be the best technology
to be used in controlling the environment.”
“And some still do,” I said.
“Oddly enough,” he said. “This troubles the Falloonian Elders
to no end.”
“I can see. What happened next?”
“In simple terms?”
“In simple terms, please.”
“In simple terms, religious contemplation led to complex
thinking, and complex thinking led to science.”
“Science?”
“Science,” he said. “And as science emerged, your species
hardened in its belief that the world had to be controlled, and, to a thoughtless
few, that control had to be carried out on their terms, and for their ends.”
“And?”
“Well hell,” he said, “can’t you see?”
“See what?”
“How science got their way.”
“I think maybe I do.”
“Let me help move you along,” he said. “I haven’t got all
day.” He puffed on his pipe until he started the smoke flowing in bullous
clouds. It was aromatic and not unpleasant. “Humankind can conceive all sorts
of weird ideas and proposals. The problem, then, is that science can test those
ideas and proposals.”
“And?”
“And how do you exert control over people with ideas that science
can prove wrong?” He puffed again. “Let me give you an example. Let’s say you
want to make people satisfied with their state of poverty. So, you tell them
you’re going to cut their source of revenue and that will increase their income.”
“That sounds a bit familiar.”
“Doesn’t it though? Now, the problem is, as you well know, a second-year college student majoring in mathematics—some call that science—can prove that proposition false in a few moments. How do you maintain your control? You can’t kill all the college students.”
“Doesn’t it though? Now, the problem is, as you well know, a second-year college student majoring in mathematics—some call that science—can prove that proposition false in a few moments. How do you maintain your control? You can’t kill all the college students.”
“No,” I said, “but how do you exert control over people with
ideas that science can prove wrong?”
“Simple,” he said. He blew a huge cloud of smoke my way and
I inhaled a bit of it. “You kill science.”
“But how?”
“First,” he said, “you kill all the teachers.”
I rose and walked away, staggering just a bit.
See also:
Enjoy these at all? If so, order Big Dope's Book at Wattensaw Press, Amazon, or other book sellers. It will make him so happy. Also, click on an ad. It earns him a little and costs the advertiser, sort of a win-win.
No comments:
Post a Comment